Wednesday, March 18, 2026

763. A Seated Figure by an Archway

Today, Lawrences of Bletchinley in Surrey continue an auction of Antiques and Collectables that started yesterday and will end tomorrow, selling 1725 items: carpets, enamel signs, fly rods, tools, guitars, stamps, terracotta plaques, stoneware, silver salvers, jewellery, but also oils, drawings, pastels, lithographs and other prints.
 
One of the lots contains a drawing by Charles Shannon. It is described as a pencil drawing, a study of a seated figure by an archway. The initials C.H.S. can be seen in the lower right hand corner, the format is 26 by 18 cm. 

C.H.S. [Charles Shannon?], 
Seated Figure by an Archway
(undated pencil drawing)

There seems to be no lithograph or painting that can be connected to this study. The three initials C.H.S. seem to indicate that this might be an early drawing.

At £10, the opening price seems reasonable.(*)

(*) Hammer price: £110.

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

762. A Fictional Cover for A Comedy of Masks (1893)

Late 1892, in an undated letter, the poet and prose writer Ernest Dowson (1867-1900) wrote to his former fellow student at Oxford, Charles Sayle (1864-1924), that the novel Dowson had written with another fellow student, Arthur Moore (1866-1952), had been accepted by publisher William Heinemann in London. The novel, started in 1890, would be published in three volumes in the autumn of 1893. 

Ernest Dowson and Arthur Moore, A Comedy of Masks
London: William Heinemann, 1893
[Photo: Maggs Bros., London]


Dowson wrote to Sayle, who had by then begun a career as a librarian and bibliographer:

Heinemann has accepted our novel, but is vague about dates, which is tedious of him.
(New Letters from Ernest Dowson. Edited & with a Preface by Desmond Flower. Andoversford: The Whittington Press, 1984, p. 16. Here the letter is dated 'late November 1889'. However, almost all issues discussed point to 1892, for example: 'Alas! the 'Albemarle' is dead'. The Albemarle Review was published between January and September 1892.)

The proofs for the first edition started arriving in February 1893, and were still occupying the writers in August. In mid-September 1893, the book was finally announced in various newspapers and magazines, such as The Academy of 16 September 1893. The intention had been to publish the book on 15 September, but it came out on 22 September. Heinemann's advertisements after publication appeared on 28 September 1893, for example in The Morning Post: 'Mr. Heinemann's New Books', claiming that it was available 'At all Libraries', meaning Charles Edward Mudie's lending library.

By that time, Dowson wrote to Victor Plarr: 

The Comedy is out at last - very charming in its outward, visible aspect, and for the rest I hope no one will discover as many inward blemishes as I can.
(The Letters of Ernest Dowson. Collected & Edited by Desmond Flower and Henry Maas. London: Cassell & Company Ltd., 1967, p. 293)

A reprint in one volume was mentioned in The Bookseller on 4 August 1894.

Ernest Dowson and Arthur Moore, A Comedy of Masks
London: William Heinemann, 1894 
[first one-volume edition]
[Photo: Maggs Bros., London]

The bindings of the first edition are stamped with an ornament combining a burning torch with a pair of masks, one for comedy and one for tragedy, the classic symbols of Thalia and Melpomene, representing the performing arts. The later, single-volume edition does not show a drama mask, but three comedy masks on a shield, the middle one representing an antique Greek mask.

But the book cover could have looked very different.

In early September 1893, Dowson received a sketch for the cover from Heinemann:

They have just sent us a suggested design for the cover - a tragic and comic mask with liberty to substitute what we like - within 5 days!! Of course in the time one can not do nothing: otherwise perhaps Horne or Ricketts might have been requisitioned.
(The Letters, p. 291)

Herbert Horne was a personal friend of Dowson. Ricketts met him twice when John Gray (or perhaps Laurence Binyon) brought Dowson to The Vale. Dowson was impressed by Silverpoints. Gray had sent him a dedication copy. Its cover by Ricketts was 'indescribably dainty', Dowson wrote (The Letters, p. 238).

If he had known that Ricketts sometimes worked very quickly, this book might have had a more attractive, even unforgettable appearance, although Ricketts himself might not have appreciated the novel.

Wednesday, March 4, 2026

761. Had Zimri Peace Who Slew His Master?

Harry Quilter (1851-1907), whose work was ridiculed by both James McNeill Whistler and Oscar Wilde, gave Shannon and Ricketts the opportunity to create drawings for his magazine The Universal Review. He would reproduce two of these drawings, both by Charles Shannon, in his art historical work Preferences in Art, Life and Literature (1892).

Preferences contained 67 illustrations. However, a deluxe large-paper edition also appeared. These numbered copies contain 114 illustrations, 56 of which were printed in autotype, mounted on additional sheets with the titles and names of the artists handwritten in ink. Among those additional illustrations are a drawing by Shannon and one by Ricketts, the latter titled 'Had Zimri Peace Who Slew His Master?'

Charles Ricketts, 'Had Zimri Peace Who Slew His Master?'
(The Universal Review, 15 August 1889)
[Photo: Jos Uljee]

The original illustration in The Universal Review measured 17.9 by 13.8 cm; the autotype reproduction was larger: 21.4 by 16.4 cm. Both the title and the name contained mistakes: Ricketts's name was given as 'H.S. Ricketts', the title was given as 'Jezebel', which was the title of the story that Ricketts and Shannon had illustrated.

Charles Ricketts, 'Had Zimri Peace Who Slew His Master?'
(published as 'Jezebel' in
Preferences in Art, Life and Literature (1892), facing page 232)

It is unclear whether Ricketts or Shannon ever laid eyes on that deluxe edition, but we do know that their friend, the poet Gordon Bottomley, was proud to have obtained a copy after years of searching. (Apparently, Bottomley had never managed to find a copy of the original reproduction in The Universal Review.)

He wrote in a letter that accompanied a copy of the book he sent as a Christmas present to Thomas Sturge Moore (13 December 1926):

We are far from Christmas yet, but I am sending your Christmas present with this as the post-office won't have it, and it too will probably take time on the railway – though I shall send it by passenger train.
It comes with a great deal of love from Emily and me to you and Marie. Of course my commercial soul is distressed by the foreknowledge that you will want to cut it up and take out the only things that are of value, for its price is going up steadily! But here it is for you to do as you like with; and we are happy in sending it, for we know you will rejoice in the superb reproduction of Ricketts’ “Jezebel” and the other treasures as much as we do.
It was really a great happiness when we found this copy some months ago, and we at once said we must have it for you.
[Quoted after the edition by John Aplin, Complete Correspondence of Gordon Bottomley and Thomas Sturge Moore. Volume 3: 1926-1948 (Letters 578-911) on the online platform Intelex, July 2020].